The Better Wordle Bot
BWB scores you against the best that a human could do, not against the work of a cheating robot armed with every possible Wordle answer (we're looking at you, Wordle Bot). See what makes BWB different.
Simulating players…
Every guess is judged against a few hundred simulated humans playing the same board — tens of thousands of games. Most take under a minute. A game that left a lot of words in play can take two or three, because there is simply more to weigh.
Starting…
What makes BWB different
BWB is based on a simple premise: humans do not think like robots, and robots do not think like humans. We humans start with probing guesses to narrow the field, converting at some point to solution-specific words. We make our early guesses based on likely letters, letter pairs and letter placement. Only after narrowing down the potential solutions do we switch to a Bot-style analysis in which we can think about all remaining words and how to winnow down the list. We find words with repeated letters harder to solve. Odd letter placements don't come to mind as readily. Robots suffer from none of those limitations.
Yet the official NYT Wordle Bot benchmarks our human efforts to solve the puzzle as if we were made of silicon, not cells. The Bot assumes that each of us has memorized the 13,000-word Wordle dictionary and can instantly calculate the portion of those words remaining after each guess. Making matters worse, the Bot actually rewards you for taking more guesses instead of fewer.
BWB takes a human-centric approach. We built an army of human simulators to solve Wordle the way humans do, focused on letters, letter groups and placement. We then compare your guesses to those of that sim swarm, recalculating what each of those sims would have guessed after each of your attempts. Over the course of your game, BWB tallies up thousands of faux-human games and uses those as a benchmark against which your game is gauged. In that way, BWB scores your game based on how a human solves Wordle, not how a computer does.
And we check that against reality. The words our simulators open with are measured from millions of real games, not invented. We backtested our sim swarm's subsequent guesses against the actual by-round outcomes of prior Wordle games and continued to refine how the simulators "think" until our solution curves closely track reality. The result? Across fifteen recent puzzles, each measured against half a million real players, our swarm now lands within a tenth of a guess of the real pace on most of them.